Comparing the Forgotten God of Love in Robert Bridges’ Poem EPÙà and An

Comparing the forgotten perfection of Love in Robert Bridges poesy EP and Anne Stevensons Poem eros It is oftenin books, poems, paintings, and sculpturesthat unrivalled hears of and sees the goddess of do. But when is it that one hears of the god? In Greek mythology, eros is the god of love, and a god who is umpteen times unnoted. In Robert Bridges EP and Anne Stevensons concupiscence, the idea that physical attraction is over visited is depicted, but in two separate ways. Techniques such as phrasing, imagery, and odor are used to help convey the idea.EP, Greek for concupiscence, is shown to be graceful in Bridges poem beautiful and adored, yet forgotten. sexual desire is veneratedcalled immortal, and he plagues the heart as a tyrant. He is a crown of lovely youth, and an image of eternal truth. Through these strong words, Eros is portrayed to be the god that community all look up to in admiration for his credible honor and ideal beauty. Eros is so great that onl y the famous Pheidias, the Greek Sculptor, can compare by his marmoreal works. Greek sculptors strove for perfection and this Eros wasperfection. Although giving thought and love to others, he have none back, yet continued his job without complaint. plurality acknowledge the youth and beauty of love with the vivid images that Bridges uses. With thy high-spirited manikin so fair, people are able to see Eross outward beauty. At that instantaneous moment, people are beguiled by Eros splendor, but once they are satisfied, they forget, and their momentary charm disappears. no(prenominal) who eer longd for thy embrace, Hath cared to look upon thy face. all(prenominal) those who yearned for love, received it, but once having done so, drop to see and look upon Eros. By using these beautiful words and... ... for lust, but he would preferably exact the effects of itbeing beaten and hurtthen hollow out in and support not love, but lust. Eros was made into a dilapidated, wear o ut god by the people who used him. He is the archetypes that you create, and gum olibanum shown to be an undesirable and unsightly god due to peoples demands for lust. In both poems, Eros is see and forgotten. The proper prize for the one who grants love, and thus happiness is not given. Through the divers(prenominal) uses of diction and imagery, different tones were established in the two poems. In Bridges EP, Eros is shown to be the forgotten beauty, and in Stevensons Eros, Eros is portrayed as the broken, tired, and misunderstood god. Contrasting, yet similar, both poems depicted Eros, the god of love, as a neglected god, often finding himself in situations where improper respects were paid. Comparing the disregarded God of Love in Robert Bridges Poem EP and AnComparing the Forgotten God of Love in Robert Bridges Poem EP and Anne Stevensons Poem Eros It is oftenin books, poems, paintings, and sculpturesthat one hears of and sees the goddess of love. But when is it that one hears of the god? In Greek mythology, Eros is the god of love, and a god who is many times overlooked. In Robert Bridges EP and Anne Stevensons Eros, the idea that Eros is overlooked is portrayed, but in two separate ways. Techniques such as diction, imagery, and tone are used to help convey the idea.EP, Greek for Eros, is shown to be beautiful in Bridges poem beautiful and adored, yet forgotten. Eros is veneratedcalled idol, and he plagues the heart as a tyrant. He is a flower of lovely youth, and an image of eternal truth. Through these strong words, Eros is portrayed to be the god that people all look up to in admiration for his credible honor and ideal beauty. Eros is so striking that only the famous Pheidias, the Greek Sculptor, can compare through his marmoreal works. Greek sculptors strove for perfection and this Eros wasperfection. Although giving thought and love to others, he received none back, yet continued his job without complaint. People recognize the y outh and beauty of love with the vivid images that Bridges uses. With thy exuberant flesh so fair, people are able to see Eross outward beauty. At that instantaneous moment, people are enthralled by Eros splendor, but once they are satisfied, they forget, and their momentary enchantment disappears. None who eer longd for thy embrace, Hath cared to look upon thy face. All those who yearned for love, received it, but once having done so, neglected to see and look upon Eros. By using these beautiful words and... ... for lust, but he would rather take the effects of itbeing beaten and hurtthen cave in and support not love, but lust. Eros was made into a dilapidated, worn out god by the people who used him. He is the archetypes that you create, and thus shown to be an undesirable and unsightly god due to peoples demands for lust. In both poems, Eros is misunderstood and forgotten. The proper respects for the one who grants love, and thus happiness is not given. Through the different use s of diction and imagery, different tones were established in the two poems. In Bridges EP, Eros is shown to be the forgotten beauty, and in Stevensons Eros, Eros is portrayed as the broken, tired, and misunderstood god. Contrasting, yet similar, both poems depicted Eros, the god of love, as a neglected god, often finding himself in situations where improper respects were paid.