Friday, May 17, 2019

Adult moral reasoning

For an adroit Fowlers framework could be the next big thing in terms of serious supposititious presents on the formation of morality and moral reasoning and the substance of faith. In a human perspective, Fowler successfully attempted to provide a picture that illustrates and guides both the individual being studied and the observer/scientist via the stages (Berger, 1994).Though these stages atomic number 18 not as explicitly applicable to all persons, like other psychologists such as Erikson and Maslow, Fowlers important contribution apparently is more than expansion of Kohlberg or Piaget. His own personal journey, lengthy and in-depth look into has given him a solid premise to work on (Berger, 1994).My personal journey may probably be described closely in the perspective which is described by Fowler. I dont have much experience and enough intellectual prowess and scholarship to be in the position to do a thorough critique on the theory and theorist.However, since it is a pers onal response paper, in that location is one segment that I can truly say that speaks a lot about who I am and my own journey. For instance, faith and morality are intricately intertwined just as faith, ethics and value are almost synonymous (Berger, 1994).Fowler may be correct to a certain extent in attributing specific concepts which indeed are descriptive of universal experiences (Berger, 1994), and I cannot argue with this theorist on this issue. It is all in all important to me that individuals must come to grips to the effects of personal faith on conduct and decision do process, and such issues as personal priorities.It is when a person decides to commit to what may be attributed as a mystical Being (i.e., in the conception of God) that spells a difference to that persons worldview or direction of life. I would still like to argue with Fowler that he has reduced so much to an intellectual rendering something which cannot be explained since there is a difference (in my pe rspective and understanding) between mere knowledge of God and veritable spirituality.I personally dont like it when intellectuals and philosophers settle to study God or morality and departing from factual substantive and life changing faith.ReferenceBerger, K. S. (1994). The developing person through the life-span. (3rd ed). Worth.

No comments:

Post a Comment